Thursday 31 May 2012

Greece: The True cost of doing nothing

As I was watching a discussion on economics last night on BBC2 Newsnight between leading US Nobel Prize winning Economist and two British Right wing advocates of Conservative George Osborne's Austerity Plan it became apparent that the Conservative Chancellor is using the Deficit as a smoke screen for an agenda which is determined at home to use Austerity to justify a reduction of state spending to 30% of GDP and internationally delights in the exit of Greece from the Euro as a smashing of the federalist dream of a European Super State.




Whilst the US Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman was fixed on ideas which might achieve a lowering of debt through economics, the British speakers Paul Mason and Alexandra Stratton repeated a classical economics mantra of Austerity leading to debt reduction as it John Maynard Keynes had never lived. I was also struck by the fact that the key determinant driving events was dithering by policy makers and fear spooking investors, markets and business.
Germany took a central role since it's determination never to repeat the hyperinflation of the 1920's gives it the determination to hold the line against those advocating a more flexible growth orientated approach. Yet what policy makers in Germany need to remember is that while policymakers in Britain and France in the 1920's stood by while their neighbours in Germany suffered in the 1923 Hyperinflation, there is a direct link between those socio-economic events then and the fear in German middle classes and industrialists that led to the rise of the Nazis and underpinned their crimes in the 1930's and 1940's. If we in Britain, Germany and France stand idly by now while Greece goes up in flames, we will see a 5-10% drop now  in our own GDP say the doomsayers  and a the rise of political extremism and instability in the Balkans dragged down by a Far Right or Far Left Greece. Old evils are rising, relations with Turkey are always difficult - how could Turkey enter Europe when Greece was so badly treated?. Surely a Far Right or Far Left Greek government would play the old card of hostility/fear of Turkey as a electoral card?
When the roof of a temple is about to cave in, then you quickly shore up the roof and protect those standing underneath from harm, not like Samson in the temple try and pull the whole edifice down around you. George Osborne is like Samson in the temple.
What would Conservative Prime Minister and once great Liberal Statesman Winston Churchill do?
He once said "When you your'e going through hell keep going". We on the other hand have stopped and are tearing out hair and beating our breasts. Churchill also said "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject."
Churchill said in 1941 : "Until now we used to say that Greeks fight like heroes. Now we shall say heroes fight like Greeks.”


I believe that if Winston Churchill had been on the backbenches now he would have been advocating collective intervention of the great powers to help Greece to stabilise it's economy so it could stay in the euro and achieve a long term plan of reconstruction and deficit stabilisation matched with economic growth. If he had been in No.11 Downing Street he would have put together a plan for support and if in No.10 Downing Streeet he would have got on a plane and flown to Athens to pledge Britain's unilateral support for Greece while Europe struggled to find a solution. Instead David Cameron sits on the side lines and counts himself lucky he is on the outside of this, yet as the forecasters show , we may be an island but the financial tsunami from a Greek exit will affect us greatly.
An alternative plan - the Greek crisis has been rumbling on since 2010, and it has led to contagion in Portugal, Spain, and Italy. Yet the initial size of Greek debt £447 billion is miniscule compared to the financial resources of the Euro Area, yet failure to stabilise Greece has led to a wider bill of Spanish, Italian and other Euro country bailouts and of the wider European and Global recession costs of doing nothing.
It is easy to carp about European failure to solve the Greek Crisis and to even blame the Greeks themselves, yet Britain has stood on the sidelines and done what exactly to help? - Britain gave just £1bn to the last bailout, yet British exposure to Greek sovereign debt might be as high as £12bn 

The Lesson of all of this is the economic mismanagement of the 1920's leading the economic crises of the 1930's which led to the victory of Keynes over the classical do nothing austerity voodoo economists of the 1930's.






Thursday 24 May 2012

The Cabinet of Public School Boys



I went to 2 State Comprehensives in late 1970's and early 1980's , one in Birmingham, the other in Hertfordshire and I got a good education, like many of my classmates. Granted both were good comprehensives which at one of which had previously been a Grammar School. Because my grades were good I got to go the the Top end Comprehensive near to my home, whilst my brother had the misfortune to go the ex-Secondary Modern School further away which wasn't as good. I have lived in Buckinghamshire since with it's eleven plus test and seem the panic in parents to get their child into a grammar school and the life impact of the Secondary Modern. I am not ashamed to say that I believe in Comprehensive Education and that wealth had no right to purchase the best education, which should be a right of all. When the time came for my own children, I decided to move to Yorkshire rather than to subscribe to a Grammar School system which operates in Buckinghamshire.
In the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition we have an Education Secretary Michael Gove who left a Comprehensive School to get into a Public School on a Scholarship and is fast tracking the Academy System across the country. I am not idealogically opposed to Academies as such but would oppose a system which recreates Grammar Schools and Secondary Modern Schools again. I am not opposed to Grammar Schools in principle having attended an ex-Grammar School. But I am opposed to Secondary Modern Schools and the pressure to decide life outcomes at age 11.
What of the Government - of the 22 Cabinet Ministers 55% are Public School boys (and Girls), led by the first Etonian Prime Minster David Cameron, since Alec Douglas Home (aka Lord Home) in 1963.

Public Schoolboys (10)
David Cameron           (PM)              Eton
Nick Clegg*               (DPM)            Westminster
George Osborne         (Chancellor)    St Pauls
Andrew Lansley          (Health)          Brentwood
Michael Gove             (Education)     Robert Gordon's
Andrew Mitchell          (Int Dev)        Rugby
Owen Patterson           (N Ireland)     Abberley Hall
Michael Moore*          (Scotland)      Strathallan Sch
Jeremy Hunt                (Culture)         Charterhouse
Lord Strathclyde         (Lancaster)     Wellington

Public School Girls (2)
Caroline Spelman       (Environment)  Essex/Herts HS
Cheryl Gillan              (Wales)           Cheltenham Ladies Coll

Grammar School Boys (6)

William Hague           (Foreign)        Wath upon Dearn GS
Ken Clarke               (Justice)          Nottingham HS (Grammar)

Philip Hammond       (Defence)        Shenfield School
Vince Cable*              (Business)       Nunfield GS
Ed Davey*                (EnergyCC)    Nottingham HS (Grammar)
Eric Pickles              (Local Gvt)     Greenhead GS

Grammar School Girl

Theresa May           (Home)             Holton Park Grammar


Secondary Modern Boy

Iain Duncan Smith  (Work Pens)      St Peters RC Secondary

Comprehensive State School

Justine Greening     (Transport)         Oakwood Comprehensive
Danny Alexander*   (Treasury)         Lochaber High School
Baroness Warsi      (No Portfolio)    Birkdale High School

It's interesting to note that only the Junior Cabinet Ministers such as Justine Greening, Danny Alexander and Baroness Warsi are from Comprehensives , and moreover Baroness Warsi's School Birkdale High School is reported as due for closure, which is something I can see happening to Cameron's school - Eton any day soon - (more's the pity.)

So not only is this Coalition , a cabinet of millionaries with people like George Osborne having a reported fortune of £4 million but it is a Cabinet of Public School Boys.(10 our of 22)

Will Greening, Alexander and Warsi speak up for benefits of Comprehensive Education - I doubt it.

The Majority of the Conservative Party in the Commons is privately educated and has 166 Public School members (54%), as against 36 Labour (14%) and 22 Liberal Democrat (39%)

Comprehensive Education is not a panacea for schools, good resourcing (average state funding per pupil is still 60% that of Public School) good teaching, a learning environment (free of stress, bullying and racism) and parental support are key elements for success.

5 Things to improve matters would be:
  1. Make it easier to sack Head Teachers (They are virtually unsackable)
  2. Abolish OFSTED - it costs a £200m terrorises teachers, and doesn't improve standards only creates a culture of failure in schools which need support.Much better a covert system which quietly routes out the bad teachers (and yes there are some) and monitors improvements without labelling schools.
  3. End Tax breaks for Public Schools.
  4. Abolish school SATS tests and let children enjoy their education - I enjoyed a test free (sadly not homework free) schooling until aged 14.
  5. Focus on re-establishing a good learning environment (monitoring and lowering stress in children) by a zero tolerance for bullying & racism.

Monday 21 May 2012

Bonkers Beecroft say Lib Dems

The battle within the Liberal Democrat-Conservative Coalition continues with a new fault line emerging over the Ultra Thatcherite Adrian Beecroft's attempts to scrap Employment Rights for workers. Thankfully wise Liberal Democrat heads like Vince Cable and Lord Oakeshot shoot down the continuing Conservative right wing agenda to use the cover of the Recession to scrap anything they are ideologically opposed to.
Last year David Cameron was insanely calling for people to pay off their credit cards and forget about spending money until he was corrected by economists about the disasterous effect on domestic retail spending on the highstreet, now Beecroft wants to terrify workers further about job security by allowing shyster employers to fire at will.



Since 2008 - there have been people with savings who have had no return from their investments due to low interest rates who have had to economise, people in work with mortgages (not having pay cuts) are much better off from low interest rates but are too terrified of losing their jobs to spend money, and people who have cut back because of pay cuts, welfare cuts and having lost their jobs. All 3 groups have cut spending and this is why we are still in recession. The Banks are not lending money to small businesses and the combination of these factors are the real reason for continuing recession.


Beecroft's plan to turn back the clock to the 1930's might sit well with the Tory right and some shyster SME employers who hate employment rights (and who wouldn't give maternity rights, holiday pay etc if they could get away with it) but the real effort needs to be with the Tory donors hedge funds etc to get them to pay more tax, so we can have tax cuts, deficit reduction along with confidence building measures in industry to make workers feel safer and start spending again. The coalition needs to make savers, workers, homeowners and those on low incomes feel more secure to lift the economy out the rut.  The only Thatcherite piece of legislation worth restoring is the full reinstatement of the 1980's Enterprise Allowance Scheme (instead of the current Ersatz copy) which would allow newly redundant workers to set up after 1 month JSA (dole) instead of making them wait 6 months.


Thursday 17 May 2012

A Bonfire of Vanities

The Conservative Party's attack on the so called Nanny State continues with the Cabinet Office's Red Tape Challenge. Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg as Deputy PM ought to know better than get involved with this waste of time which is costing who knows what.




They are claiming to be scrapping 84% of the health and safety laws, but so far have only abolished redundant and superceeded legislation, and other changes to RIDDOR regulations have not impacted the need for companies to keep the necessary records on accidents in the workplace, now they just keep the HSE in the dark about them.

So far all this change has been a waste of time and money which is actually costing small businesses more to cuts at the HSE ending free phone information and making safety inspections chargeable if faults are found under the cost recovery scheme.

The bonfire of regulations is a bonfire of vanities which is confusing business, costing money, unsettling unions and workers and mere a smokescreen for the lack of economic growth.

Monday 7 May 2012

Goodbye Austerity, Hello Growth

France and Greece have voted against Austerity. Britain has voted against Austerity. We need a new Coalition Chancellor of the Exchequer at the Treasury with a new plan. It needs to be someone who has had a proper job outside politics. It needs to be someone who can work a calculator and communicate with the people. It needs to be the economist and Liberal Democrat Business Secretary Vince Cable.

A 5 Step Plan for ending Austerity

















  1. Create a million dole entrepreneurs and boost growth by 0.5% - Cost neutral.
  2. Put a million solar panels on a million rooftops. Create 3 Gigawatts of free renewal energy, create 100,000 jobs. - Cost £5 billion. Boost Growth by 1%
  3. Scrap Employment Law changes - promote job security and boost growth by 0.5% - Cost neutral.
  4. Sell £100bn of Government Assets in London & move Jobs and Government offices out of London. Boost Growth by 0.5% - save £110bn. 
  5. A New Plan for the Banks - keep asset sheets as they are, force nationally owned banks to lend to UK Businesses. Boost growth by 1.0%
It is vital that a credible deficit reduction programme is continued at the same time as a prosperity programme which will deliver higher tax revenues and create a spiral of growth rather than the current downward spiral.

Both coalition parties would agree that structural reforms are necessary to remove the limits to growth, they just disagree about what laws to scrap. The Tories want a bonfire of our safety and employment laws, Liberal Democrats know that job security underpins consumer confidence and consumer spending. Nonetheless some minor reforms to streamline red tape might help but only if done by those who know what to scrap and what to keep. Safety Investment helps the UK economy save £30bn a year, imagine a Buncefield every year.

At the moment the Coalition is making the wrong call in it's 50:50 choices - with Posh Toffs in charge - the wrong people are getting taxed and cut, but the good news is that it is still fixable and there are groups of Liberal Democrats  and Conservatives who would back a entrepreneurial, green growth and anti-bank , regional and anti-bank agenda for growth - if Cameron and Clegg have the guts to make the right choices. 

Saturday 5 May 2012

The ides of May - what next for the Coalition?

The verdict of the public is in. Both Coalition parties are trounced in the polls, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats lose 300+ seats. Labour is the winner but the public is sceptical and turnout is low. What is clear is that the Liberal Democrats are not going to make it to 2015 intact if things continue as they are. The Party will revolt, the public will not forgive or forget. Just like the Major government in 93, the public held a grudge for 4 years when they took their rightful democratic revenge. What to do, clearly as has been said in previous blogs - it was right to go into coalition in 2010 to save the country from a Greek style meltdown. Stability has been achieved but Plan Austerity (Plan A) has failed to sustain enough growth to enable the deficit plan. A Plan C (for Cable) is needed to see more growth achieved by intelligent supply side reforms (I don't mean lessening employment protection which has depressed job security and domestic demand) but by creating a million dole entrepreneurs and confidence building measures. Bank reform should ensure that we fast track to profitability for State Owned Banks but force lending and don't just force banks to pad their balance sheets.  What should the Lib Dems do ? - Just staying put won't work, the public demand a stonger liberal voice, yes simple "muscular liberalism" is only window dressing presentation rather than substance.  Sacking Nick Clegg on it's own wouldn't be enough, and would be unnecessary. 2 options remain - to stay in the Cabinet or for Lib Dems to leave the Government. The smart thing to do is signal to the public that the Lib Dems are in the driving seat, by replacing George Osborne at the Treasury with Vince Cable and putting a more creative Plan C style growth programme forward. If Cameron can't wear this , then the alternative is for the Lib Dems to leave the government and cross the floor back into opposition. This act will put clear water between us and the tories but we keep our word in the 2010 coalition agreement and vote with the government on any item covered under the coalition agreement while voting them down or negotating with them over anything else. Thus we turn cameron's tories into a lame duck government (or duck pond) while holding the moral high ground against them and Labour. We advocate a plan c growth plan and build a new coalition in the country around this while demanding a redress of grievances such as abolition of student tuition fees (our massive mistake of 2010). We need to torpedo "poll tax " suicide policies like NHS reform and Caravan tax.  Time to rebuild the party, also the opposition money would create some fighting funds for 2015.